El centurión del Evangelio de Marcos: testigo del evangelio de Pablo
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El personaje del centurión del Evangelio de Marcos (Mc 15,39) ha suscitado muchas preguntas e interpretaciones diversas. Desde quienes consideran su intervención como la última burla y sarcasmo que evidencian el fracaso de Jesús, hasta quienes ven en su breve reconocimiento la mayor confesión de fe en Jesús. El evangelista no aclara en su relato el porqué de su intervención ni su significado: ¿qué le llevó a este centurión a afirmar que aquel crucificado era hijo de Dios? Las múltiples conexiones del Evangelio de Marcos con las cartas paulinas ofrecen claves de interpretación para responder a las preguntas y ambigüedades de la breve intervención del centurión. Sin ellas resulta difícil captar el sentido de este personaje y, con ellas, se descubre que el Evangelio de Marcos comparte con Pablo la centralidad del mensaje de la cruz.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Está permitida la reutilización del contenido bajo una licencia:
Reconocimiento
CC BY
Esta licencia permite a otros distribuir, mezclar, ajustar y construir a partir de su obra, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que le sea reconocida la autoría de la creación original. Esta es la licencia más servicial de las ofrecidas. Recomendada para una máxima difusión y utilización de los materiales sujetos a la licencia.
Citas
Álvarez Cineira, David. “The Centurion's Statement (Mark 15:39): A Restituio Memoriae.” In Jesus - Gestalt Und Gestaltungen: Rezeptionen Des Galiläers in Wissenschaft, Kirche Und Gesellschaft ; Festschrift Für Gerd Theißen Zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Gerd Theissen, Petra von Gemünden, David G. Horrell, Max Küchler, Ralph Hochschild and Markus Lau, 153-68. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.
Becker, Eve-Marie, Troels Engberg-Pedersen, and Mogens Müller, eds. Mark and Paul. Part Ii, for and against Pauline Influence on Mark: Comparative Essays. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
Black, C. Clifton. “Christ Crucified in Paul and in Mark: Reflections on an Intracanonical Conversation.” In Theology and Ethics in Paul and His Interpreters, edited by Eugene H. Lovering and Jerry L. Sumney, 184-206. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996.
Blinzler, Joseph. The Trial of Jesus: The Jewish and Roman Proceedings against Jesus Christ. Westminster, Md.: Newman Press, 1959.
Blount, Brian K. “Is the Joke on Us?: Mark's Irony, Mark's God, and Mark's Ending.” In The Ending of Mark and the Ends of God, 15-32. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.
Boring, M. Eugene. Mark: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville, Ky.; London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2006.
Bormann, Lukas. “Die Paulusbriefe Und Das Markusevangelium in Der Perspektive Des Lukasevangeliums Un Der Apostelgeschichte.” In Paul and Mark: Comparative Essays Part 1. Two Authors at the Beginning of Christianity, edited by Oda Wischmeyer, David C. Sim and I. J. Elmer, 617-45. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.
Bureth, Paul, and Friedrich Preisigke. Les Titulatures Impériales Dans Les Papyrus, Les Ostraca Et Les Inscriptions D'égypte : (30 A.C.-284 P.C.). Papyrologica Bruxellensia. Bruxelles: Fondation égyptologique reine Elisabeth, 1964.
Camery-Hoggatt, Jerry. Irony in Mark's Gospel: Text and Subtext. Monograph Series / Society for New Testament Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Campbell, Brian. The Roman Army, 31 Bc-Ad 337: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 1994.
Collins, Adela Yarbro. “Mark and His Readers: The Son of God among Greeks and Romans.” The Harvard Theological Review 93, no. 2 (2000): 85-100.
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Edited by Harold W. Attridge. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007.
Colwell, Ernest C. “A Definite Rule for the Use of the Article in the Greek New Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 52, no. 1 (1933): 12-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3259477.
Davidsen, Ole. “Adam-Christ Typology in Paul and Mark: Reflections on a Tertium Comparationis.” In Mark and Paul. Part Ii, for and against Pauline Influence on Mark: Comparative Essays, edited by Eve-Marie Becker, Troels Engberg-Pedersen and Mogens Müller, 243-72. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
Donahue, John R., and Daniel J. Harrington. The Gospel of Mark. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 2002.
Dykstra, Tom. Mark, Canonizer of Paul: A New Look at Intertextuality in Mark’s Gospel. St. Paul, Minn.: OCABS Press, 2012.
Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Mark. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2002.
Erdkamp, Paul. A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World Ancient History. Malden, Mass. ; Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.
Eubank, Nathan. “Dying with Power: Mark 15,39 from Ancient to Modern Interpretation.” Biblica, no. 95 (2014): 247-68.
Evans, Craig A. Mark 8:27-16:20. Word Biblical Commentary. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2001.
Feagin, Glyndle M. Irony and the Kingdom in Mark: A Literary-Critical Study. Lewiston, NY ; Lampeter: Mellen Biblical Press, 1997.
Ferguson, Cameron. “The Binding of Past to Present: A New Perspective on the Use of Paul in the Gospel of Mark.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2019. https://search.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/binding-past-present-new-perspective-on-use-paul/docview/2300150399/se-2?accountid=14529.
Ferguson, Cameron Evan. A New Perspective on the Use of Paul in the Gospel of Mark. Routledge Studies in the Early Christian World. London: Routledge, 2021. doi:10.4324/9781003092681.
Fowler, Robert M. Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.
France, R.T. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans, 2002.
Gamel, Brian K. “The Centurion's Confession as Apocalyptic Unveiling: Mark 15:39 as a Markan Theology of Revelation.” Baylor University, 2014. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1651522815?pq-origsite=primo.
Garroway, Joshua D. The Beginning of the Gospel: Paul, Philippi, and the Origins of Christianity. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
Gil Arbiol, Carlos. “El Fracaso Del Proyecto De Pablo Y Su Reconstrucción.” Estudios Bíblicos 73, no. 3 (2015): 373-408.
Gil Arbiol, Carlos. “Otros Doce. Los Personajes Secundarios Como Creyentes Paulinos En El Evangelio De Marcos.” Estudios Eclesiásticos. Revista de investigación e información teológica y canónica 96, no. 378 (09/21 2021): 533-70. https://doi.org/10.14422/ee.v96.i378.y2021.005.
Gnilka, Joachim. El Evangelio Según San Marcos. Mc 8,27 - 16,20. Vol. 2. Salamanca: Sígueme, 1993.
Goodacre, Mark S. The Case against Q : Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem. Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 2002.
Gundry, Robert H. Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.
Horsley, Richard A. Hearing the Whole Story : The Politics of Plot in Mark's Gospel. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
Iverson, Kelly R. “A Centurion's “Confession”: A Performance-Critical Analysis of Mark 15:39.” Journal of Biblical Literature 130, no. 2 (2011): 329-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/41304204.
Jackson, Howard M. “The Death of Jesus in Mark and the Miracle from the Cross.” New Testament Studies 33, no. 1 (1987): 16-37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500016039.
Johnson, Earl S. “Is Mark 15.39 the Key to Mark's Christology?”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 10, no. 31 (1987): 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x8701003101.
Johnson, Earl S. “Mark 15,39 and the So-Called Confession of the Roman Centurion.” Biblica 81, no. 14 (2000): 406-13.
Juel, Donald H. A Master of Surprise: Mark Interpreted. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994.
Kim, Tae Hun. “The Anarthrous Υιος Θεου in Mark 15,39 and the Roman Imperial Cult.” Biblica 79 (1998): 221-41.
Lane, William L. The Gospel According to Mark. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974.
Marcus, Joel. El Evangelio Según Marcos 8,22-16,8: Nueva Traducción Con Introducción Y Comentario. Biblioteca De Estudios Bíblicos. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2011.
Marcus, Joel. “Mark - Interpreter of Paul.” New Testament Studies 46 (2000): 473-87.
Marcus, Joel. “Mark - Interpreter of Paul.” In Mark and Paul. Part Ii, for and against Pauline Influence on Mark: Comparative Essays, edited by Eve-Marie Becker, Troels Engberg-Pedersen and Mogens Müller, 29-49. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
Pérez i Díaz, Mar. Mark, a Pauline Theologian: A Re-Reading of the Traditions of Jesus in the Light of Paul's Theology. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen Zum Neuen Testament / 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.
Rhoads, David M., Joanna Dewey, and Donald Michie. Marcos Como Relato: Introducción a La Narrativa De Un Evangelio. Biblioteca De Estudios Bíblicos. Salamanca: Sígueme, 2002.
Shiner, Whitney Taylor. “The Ambiguous Pronouncement of the Centurion and the Shrouding of Meaning in Mark.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 78 (2000): 3-22.
Sim, David C. “The Family of Jesus and the Disciples of Jesus in Paul and Mark: Taking Sides in the Early Church's Factional Dispute “. In Paul and Mark: Comparative Essays Part 1. Two Authors at the Beginning of Christianity, edited by Oda Wischmeyer, David C. Sim and I. J. Elmer, 73-99. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.
Sim, David C. “The Reception of Paul and Mark in the Gospel of Matthew “. In Paul and Mark: Comparative Essays Part 1. Two Authors at the Beginning of Christianity, edited by Oda Wischmeyer, David C. Sim and I. J. Elmer, 589-615. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.
Strack, Hermann L., and Paul Billerbeck. Kommentar Zum Neuen Testament Aus Talmud Und Midrash. Vol 1, Das Evangelium Nach Matthaus. Munchen: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1922.
Tannehill, Robert C. “The Disciples in Mark: The Function of a Narrative Role.” The Journal of Religion 57, no. 4 (1977): 386-405.
Tannehill, Robert C. “The Gospel of Mark as Narrative Christology.” In Perspectives on Mark's Gospel, edited by Normann R. Petersen, 57-95. Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1980.
Tyson, Joseph B. “The Blindness of the Disciples in Mark.” Journal of biblical literature 80, no. 3 (1961): 261-68.
Ulansey, David. “The Heavenly Veil Torn: Mark's Cosmic Inclusio.” Journal of Biblical Literature 110, no. 1 (1991): 123-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3267155.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre. Mito Y Sociedad En La Grecia Antigua. 4a ed. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2003.
Weeden, Theodore J. “Cross as Power in Weakness (Mark 15:20b-41).” In Passion in Mark, edited by Werner H. Kelber, 115-29. Toronto: Macmillan, 1976.
Weeden, Theodore J. Mark: Traditions in Conflict. Philadelphia: Fortress Pr, 1971.
Wendt, Heidi. “Secrecy as Pauline Influence on the Gospel of Mark.” Journal of Biblical Literature 140, no. 3 (2021): 579-600. https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.7.
Williams, Catrin H., Eve-Marie Becker, and Helen K. Bond, eds. John's Transformation of Mark. Edinburgh: T.& T.Clark Ltd, 2021.
Wischmeyer, Oda, David C. Sim, and I. J. Elmer, eds. Paul and Mark: Comparative Essays Part 1. Two Authors at the Beginning of Christianity, Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Für Die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft Und Die Kunde Der Älteren Kirche, vol. volume 198. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.