Aquinas in Protestant Biblical Hermeneutics (El Aquinate en la hermenéutica bíblica protestante)

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF
Publicado: dic 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.18.351
Palabras clave:
Biblical Thomism, sola Scriptura, medieval biblical exegesis, Revelation tomismo biblico, sola Scriptura, exegesis bíblica medieval, Revelacion

Contenido principal del artículo

Piotr Roszak
Universytet Mikołaja Kopernika

Resumen

Santo Tomás de Aquino y su interpretación de las Escrituras aparecen con frecuencia en los estudios contemporáneos de los teólogos protestantes. Históricamente, la recepción de su exégesis bíblica en la tradición protestante revela un terreno común, en el que la cuestión de la comprensión de la Revelación ocupa el primer lugar, pero también indica las diferencias, como por ejemplo la cuestión del significado de la autoridad eclesial, expresada en forma de símbolos de fe. La sección final de este artículo examinará las referencias al Aquinate entre los teólogos protestantes contemporáneos, tanto los temas como la evaluación de los mecanismos interpretativos utilizados por el Aquinate.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Roszak, P. (2023). Aquinas in Protestant Biblical Hermeneutics (El Aquinate en la hermenéutica bíblica protestante). Cauriensia. Revista Anual De Ciencias Eclesiásticas, 18, 351–376. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.18.351
Número
Vol. 18 (2023)
Sección
Estudios Miscelánea / Miscellaneous Studies
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

El Instituto Teológico de Cáceres (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas en Cauriensia. Revista anual de Ciencias Eclesiásticas

Está permitida la reutilización del contenido bajo una licencia:

Reconocimiento
CC BY

Esta licencia permite a otros distribuir, mezclar, ajustar y construir a partir de su obra, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que le sea reconocida la autoría de la creación original. Esta es la licencia más servicial de las ofrecidas. Recomendada para una máxima difusión y utilización de los materiales sujetos a la licencia.

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Citas

Baglow, Christopher. T. “Modus Et Forma”: A New Approach to the Exegesis of Saint Thomas Aquinas with an Application to the Lectura super Epistulam ad Ephesios (Rome: Editrice PIB, 2002).

Barclay, John M.“A Thomist Reading of Paul? Response and Reflections”, Nova et Vetera 17 (2019) 1: 235–244.

Barth, Markus. Ephesians: Translation and Commentary (New York: Doubleday, 1974).

Beckwith, Francis J. Never Doubt Thomas: The Catholic Aquinas as Evangelical and Protestant (Waco: Baylor University Press, 2019).

Blankenhorn, Bernhard. “Double Agency in St. Paul and in St. Thomas Aquinas”, Angelicum 91 (2014) 1: 127– 148.

Blankenhorn, Bernhard. Locating a Theology of Revelation in the Works of Saint Thomas Aquinas, in R. Barron – S. W. Hahn – J. R. A. Merrick (eds.), Engaging Catholic Doctrine: Essays in Honor of Matthew Levering (Steubenville: Emmaus Academic, 2023).

Bockmuehl, Markus. Aquinas on Abraham’s Faith in Romans, in M. Levering – M. Dauphinais (eds.), Reading Romans with St. Thomas Aquinas (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).

Cavalli, Francis B. Aquinas and Calvin on Predestination: Is There Any Common Ground? “Reformed Faith and Practice”, https://journal.rts.edu/article/aquinas-and-calvin-on-predestination-is-there-any-common-ground/

Childs, Brevard S. Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993).

Childs, Brevard S. The Struggle to Understand Isaiah as Christian Scripture (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004).

Congar, Yves. A History of Theology, transl. and ed. by H. Guthrie (Garden City: Doubleday, 1968).

Dauphinais, Michael. “Love as the Law of the Gift: Reading Paul with John Barclay and Aquinas”, Nova et Vetera, English Edition 17 (2019) 1: 149–181.

Enriquez, María Teresa and Jorge Martín, Montoya. “Imperium and causality in Thomas Aquinas”. Scientia et Fides 1(2021): 329–355. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2021.013

Geisler, Norman. Thomas Aquinas: An Evangelical Appraisal (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Publishing, 1991).

Giambrone, Anthony. Aquinas between Abelard and Erasmus: A Brief Ressourcement of Thomistic Theology of Biblical Translation, in R. Barron – S. W. Hahn – J. R. A. Merrick (eds.), Engaging Catholic Doctrine: Essays in Honor of Matthew Levering (Steubenville: Emmaus Academic, 2023), 107-163.

Harkins, Franklin T. Docuit Excellentissimae Divinitatis Mysteria: St. Paul in Thomas Aquinas, in S. Cartwright (ed.), A Companion to St. Paul in the Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 235–263.

Helm, Paul. Nature and Grace, in M. Svensson – D. VanDrunen (eds.), Aquinas Among the Protestants (Oxford: Blackwell, 2018), 229–247.

Hill, Wesley. Paul and the Trinity: Persons, Relations, and the Pauline Letters (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015).

Holmes, Jeremy. Participation and the Meaning of Scripture, in P. Roszak – J. Vijgen (eds.), Reading Sacred Scripture with Thomas Aquinas: Hermeneutical Tools, Theological Questions and New Perspectives (Turnhout: Brepols, 2015).

Izquierdo, Cesar. Parádosis: estudios sobre la tradición (Pamplona: Eunsa, 2006).

Levering, Matthew, Paul in the Summa Theologiae (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2014).

Levering, Matthew. “Ecclesial Exegesis and Ecclesial Authority: Childs, Fowl, and Aquinas”, The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 69 (2005) 3: 407–467.

Levering, Matthew. Augustine and Aquinas on the Good Shepherd: The Value of an Exegetical Tradition, in M. Dauphinias – B. David – M. Levering (eds.), Aquinas the Augustinian (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 205–242.

Levering, Matthew. Participatory Biblical Exegesis: A Theology of Biblical Interpretation (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008).

Levering, Matthew. Scripture and Metaphysics: Aquinas and the Renewal of Trinitarian Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).

Levering, Matthew. The Scriptures and Their Interpretation, in L. Ayres – M. A. Volpe (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 42–54.

Levering, Matthew. Was the Reformation a Mistake? Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical (Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 2016).

Mansini, Guy. “Without Me You Can Do Nothing”: St. Thomas with and without St. Augustine on John 15:5, in M. Dauphinias – B. David – M. Levering (eds.), Aquinas the Augustinian (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2007), 159-180.

Martens, John W. Aquinas, Modern Biblical Exegesis and Dei Verbum, “America Magazine”, https://www.americamagazine.org/content/good-word/aquinas-modern-biblical-exegesis-and-dei-verbum/.

Meconi, David V. “The Ultimate Gift: The Transformative Indwelling of Christ and the Christian”, Nova et Vetera”, English Edition 17 (2019) 1: 197–213.

Muller, Richard A. Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 2003).

Nannini, Andrea and Marcin Trepczyński. “In principio”: The Metaphysical Exegesis of John 1:1 by Albert the Great, Bonaventure and Thomas Aquinas”. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia 2(2022): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2022.009.

Pesch, Otto-Herman . “Paul as Professor of Theology: The Image of the Apostle in St. Thomas’s Theology”, The Thomist 38 (1974) 1: 584–605.

Raith II, Charles. “Aquinas on Paul’s Use of the Old Testament: The Implications of Participation”, Logos 18 (2015) 2: 66–87.

Roberts, Dewey. Aquinas Is Not A Safe Guide For Protestants: Reading Aquinas with care and caution, “The Aquila Report”, https://theaquilareport.com/aquinas-is-no-safe-guide-for-protestants/

Roszak, Piotr. “Exegesis y metafisica. En torno a la hermeneutica biblica de santo Tomas de Aquino”, Salmanticensis 61 (2014): 301–323.

Roszak, Piotr. “Text, Method, or Goal? On What Really Matters in Biblical Thomism”, Religions 14 (2023): 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010003

Salgado, Jose-Manuel. “Eclesialidad y salvación según B.-D. de La Soujeole”, Scripta Theologica 2(2022), 369-394. https://doi.org/10.15581/006.54.2.369-394

Seitz, Christopher R. Colossians: Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2014).

Sipling, William. Aquinas as Evangelical Historical-Critical Biblical Commentator: Hebrews 6:1-12, in Aquinas the Biblical Theologian Conference, Ave Maria University, Ave Maria, FL, February 2, 2019.

Stiltner, Brian. “Who Can Understand Abraham? The Relation of God and Morality in Kierkegaard and Aquinas”, The Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1993) 2: 221–245.

Sytsma, David S. Thomas Aquinas and Reformed Biblical Interpretation: The Contribution of William Whitaker, in Manfred Svensson – David VanDrunen (eds.), Aquinas Among the Protestants (Oxford: Blackwell, 2018).

Sytsma, David. S. Sixteenth-Century Reformed Reception of Aquinas, in M. Levering – M. Plested (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The Reception of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).

Wright, Nicholas T. After You Believe: Why Christian Character Matters (New York: HarperOne, 2010).