Environmental ethics facing the evil of ecocide

Main Article Content

Tatay Nieto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0786-8238

Abstract

This article analyzes the way in which the various currents of ecological ethics, or ecoethics, have conceptualized environmental degradation and biodiversity loss and affirms that their most dramatic expression —ecocide— is an evil. In dialogue with theological ecoethics, I argue —in the face of the danger of moral monism that often permeates the ethical debate on sustainability— the desirability of adopting a pluralistic vision in which the various modes of ethical reasoning converge to denounce the evil of ecocide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tatay Nieto, J. (2023). Environmental ethics facing the evil of ecocide. Cauriensia. Revista Anual De Ciencias Eclesiásticas, 18, 693–708. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.18.693
Section
Monographic Studies 1
Author Biography

Tatay Nieto, Unversidad Pontificia Comillas

Professor of Ethics and Sustainability; Hana and Francisco J. Ayala Chair in Science Technology and Religion

References

Aquino, Santo Tomás, Suma teológica. Madrid: BAC, 2010.

Araújo, Joana, Carlos Costa Gomes, António Bartolomeu Jácomo Ferreira. “A casa ‘in’ comun dos refugiados ambientais à luz da Laudato si”. Cauriensia 11 (2016): 407–426.

Cafaro, Philip. “Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Toward an Environmental Vir¬tue Ethic”. Environmental Ethics 23, 1 (2001): 3-17.

Cafaro, Philip. “Three ways to think about the sixth mass extinction”. Biological Conservation 192 (2015): 387-393.

Ceballos, Gerardo, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anthony D. Barnosky, Andrés García, Rob¬ert M. Pringle, Todd M. Palmer. “Accelerated modern human–induced spe¬cies losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction”. Science Advance 1, 5 (2015): 1-5.

Francisco. Carta encíclica Laudato si’. Sobre el cuidado de la casa común. Roma: Librería Editrice Vaticana, 2015.

Galston, Arthur W. “Science and Social Responsibility: A Case History”. An¬nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 196 (1972): 223–35.

Higgins, Polly, Damien Short, Nigel South. “Protecting the Planet: A Proposal for a Law of Ecocide”. Crime, Law and Social Change 59 (2013): 251–266.

Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Macintyre, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court, 1999.

Norton, Bryan G. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Organización de Naciones Unidas. Declaración de la Conferencia de Naciones Unidas para el medio humano. Estocolmo: ONU, 1972.

Rolston, Holmes. “Respect for Life: Counting what Singer Finds of no Account”. En Singer and His Critics, editado por Dale Jamieson, 247-268. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.

Rolston, Holmes. Environmental Ethics: Duties and values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.

Routley, Richard. “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic?”. Varna, Bulgaria: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of Philosophy, 1973, 205-210.

Sandler, Ronald L. Character and Environment. A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.

Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: Harper Collins, 2002.

Tatay, Jaime. Ecología integral. La recepción católica del reto de la sostenibilidad: 1891 (RN) – 2015 (LS). Madrid: BAC, 2018.

Taylor, Paul W. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Pres, 1986.

Twitchett, Richard J., “The Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvi-ronmental Analysis of Mass Extinction Events”. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232 (2006): 190–213.

Van Wensveen, Louke. Dirty Virtues. The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Eth¬ics. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.

Wilson, Edward O. Half Earth: Our Planet's Fight for Life. New York: Liveright Publishing, 2017.