Articles will be sent confidentially and anonymously for analysis to two expert reviewers from outside the journal's publisher and its editorial board. They may belong to the Advisory Board, provided that they do not belong to either the journal's publisher or the editorial board. They will issue a report on the appropriateness or otherwise of their publication, which will be taken into consideration by the Secretariat of the Editorial Board, and the author will be informed of whether or not it has been published, or if it has been modified. In the event of a difference of opinion between the two evaluators, the work will be sent to a third evaluator. The revised work considered for publication, subject to the inclusion of modifications, must be corrected and returned to the Journal by the authors within a maximum period of one month, whether minor or major corrections are requested. If necessary, the new version will be sent back to the external reviewers, a procedure that will be followed until it is definitively accepted by the Journal. Authors will be notified of the reviewers' evaluation reports so that they can make (if necessary) the appropriate corrections. In the event that they could be published, but had some aspect to change: if it is minimal it will be done by the Editorial Board consulted by the author; but it can also be referred to the author so that he or she can change those aspects that the Editorial Board considers appropriate.

Submissions will be made either through the OJS platform or by email to publicaciones@diocesiscoriacaceres.es

There are two types of review forms. 1. On the OJS platform if the reviewer carries out his review by the platform. 2. A form that will be sent to you if it is done by e-mail and that can be seen HERE