Diversity, inclusion and equality. Subsidiarity as a possible regulatory principle

Main Article Content

paz Molero Hernández
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-5110

Abstract

These lines aim to give a new perspective of diversity and the inclusion, approaching them under the foundation of subsidiarity, so that it is this that acts as a guide and mitigates the inherent challenges that both sometimes entail. It is about seeing if the so often forgotten principle of subsidiarity could act in some way by shedding light on these conflicts and if, as a regulating or guiding principle, it is prior to the right of inclusion and respect for diversity.


In order to properly present the object of study, the relationship between inequality, justice and poverty, with which subsidiarity is usually associated, is previously addressed. The issue is not tangential, because interpreting the fight against poverty and the fight for justice as a fight against inequality can lead to proposals that lead to solutions that lack the proportion given by the principle of subsidiarity.


Finally, it is concluded that this principle limits intervention, but requires it. It expresses both a positive and negative vision of the role of the state or higher authorities with respect to society and the individual. That is, it is a type of non-permanent assistance and does not describe a defined way of sharing tasks. Therefore, it always respects the autonomy of each person and must be designed in such a way that it allows the emancipation of people and the development of their initiative and freedom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Molero Hernández, P. (2025). Diversity, inclusion and equality. Subsidiarity as a possible regulatory principle. Cauriensia. Revista Anual De Ciencias Eclesiásticas, 20, 396–410. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.20.395
Section
Estudios Miscelánea / Miscellaneous Studies

References

Ablander, Michael. “How to Overcome Structural Injustice? Social Connectedness and the Tenet of Subsidiarity”. Journal of Business Ethics 162 (2020): 719-732.

Castán Tobeñas, José. Los Derechos del Hombre. Madrid: Reus, 1992.

Costa, Erika y Tommaso Ramus. “The Italian Economia Aziendale and Catholic social teaching: How to apply the common good principle at the managerial level”. Journal of Business Ethics 106, n. 1 (2012): 103-116.

De Jouvenel, Bertrand. La ética de la redistribución. Madrid: Encuentro, 2011.

Fernández Concha, Rafael. Filosofía del Derecho. Barcelona: Tipografía católica Casals, 1887.

Frémeaux, Sandrine. “A common good perspective on diversity”. Business Ethics Quar¬terly 30, n. 2 (2020): 200-228.

Hittinger, Russell. “Social roles and ruling virtues in catholic social doctrine”. Annales theologici 16, n. 2 (2016): 295-318.

Kelley, Scott. “Subsidiarity: Challenging the top down bias”. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics 1, n. 2 (2010): 3-12.

Martini, Alice y Luca Spataro. “The principle of subsidiarity and the ethical factor in Giuseppe Toniolo’s thought”. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1) (2018): 105-119.

McVea, John y Michael Naughton. “Enriching Social Entrepreneurship”. Religions 12, n. 173 (2021): 2-17.

Melé, Domenech. “Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The per-sonalist and the common good principles”. Journal of Business ethics 88, n. 1 (2009): 227-244.

Molero Hernández, Paz. “Algunos desafíos del concepto de diversidad como consecuen¬cia de la migración y del multiculturalismo”. Investigación y transferencia de las Ciencias Sociales en un mundo en crisis, coordinado por Manuel Bermúdez Váz¬quez, Alfonso Chaves Montero, 915-932. Madrid: Dyckinson, 2022.

Real Academia Española (s.f). En Diccionario de la lengua española. https://dle.rae.es/subsidiariedad

Rhonheimer, Martin. Libertad económica, capitalismo y ética cristiana: Ensayos para un encuentro entre economía y mercado y pensamiento cristiano. Madrid: Unión Editorial, 2017.

Rodríguez Luño, Ángel. “Economía y desigualdad”, eticaepolitica, 2018. https://www.eticaepolitica.net/eticapolitica.htm

Sison, Alejo José y Joan Fontrodona. “Participating in the common good of the firm”, Journal of Business Ethics 113, n. 4 (2013): 611-625.

Unión Europea. Tratado de la Unión Europea, firmado en Maastricht el 7 de febrero de 1992. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 191, 29 de julio de 1992, 1-112.