The Evolution of the Leibnizian Notion of “Primary Matter” and its Scholastic Background (La evolución de la noción leibniziana de “materia prima” y sus antecedents escolásticos)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to clarify the evolution of the notion of primary matter in Leibniz’s philosophy. The analysis takes the scholastic discussion on the reality of primary matter as a framework to explain the development of Leibniz’s ideas. It will be shown that Leibniz argued in his earlier writings for a conception of primary matter as some sort of being (similarly in line with some scholastic philosophers like Scoto, Ockam, and Suarez). In contrast, in his mature metaphysics, he deployed this primary matter of reality, approaching Aquinas’s position in a creative and novelty manner.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Publications Service of the University of Extremadura (the publishing house) retains the economic rights (copyright) of the works published in the Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho. Universidad de Extremadura.. The reuse of the content is allowed under a license:
CC BY
Recognition
This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak and build upon your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you are acknowledged as the author of the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. The maximum dissemination and use of the materials subject to the license are recommended.
For more information, see the following links:
References
PRIMARY SOURCES
A = Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Darmstadt: Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1923.
AG = G. W. Leibniz. Philosophical Essays (Roger Ariew, Daniel Garber, eds.), Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.
Arthur = The Yale Leibniz: The Labyrinth of the Continuum. Writings on the Continuum Problem 1672-1686 (Richard Arthur, ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.
G = Leibnizens mathematische Schriften. (C. I. Gerhardt, ed.). Berlin: Hildesheim, 1962.
GM = Leibnizens mathematische Schriften. (C. I. Gerhardt, ed.). Berlin: Hildesheim, 1962.
Huggard = Theodicy Essays: On the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and The Origin of Evil (Austin Farrer, ed. and E. M. Huggard, tr.) New Haven, Yale University Press, 1952.
L = Philosophical Papers and Letters: A Selection, (Leroy E. Loemker, ed.) Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Lodge = The Yale Leibniz: The Leibniz-De Volder correspondence: with selections from the correspondence between Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli (Paul Lodge, ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
SECONDARY SOURCES
Adams, Robert Merrihew. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York, 1999. Online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Nov. 2003.
Antognazza, Maria Rosa. “Primary Matter, Primitive Passive Power, and Creaturely Limitation in Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 46, no. 2 (2014): 167-186.
Aquinas, Thomas, Corpus Thomisticum, edited by Enrique Alarcon. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, 2000. Online: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/.
Augustine, Saint. Confessions. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press,1953.
Bernstein, Howard R. “Passivity and Inertia in Leibniz’s Dynamics.” Studia Leibnitiana 13, no. 1 (1981): 97-113.
Brock, Stephen L. “Thomas Aquinas and What Actually Exists.” In Wisdom’s Apprentice. Thomistic Essays in Honor of L. Dewan OP, edited by P. Kwasniewski, 13-39. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America, 2007.
Burgersdijk, Franciscus. Collegium physicum. Leiden: Ex Officina Elziviriorum, 1642.
Dabillon, André. La physique des bons esprits, ou l’idée et abrégé d’une physique familière et solide. Paris: Sebastien Piquet, 1643.
Descartes, René. The philosophical writings of Descartes I, edited by John Cottingham et al. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985.
Duarte, Shane. “Leibniz and Prime Matter.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53, no. 3 (2015): 435-460.
Garber, Daniel. Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Jauernig, Anja. “Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypotheses.” The Leibniz Review 18 (2008): 1-40.
Kepler, Johannes. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. VII, edited by Max Caspar and Walter von Dyck. München: C. H. Beck, 1991.
McGuire, James E. “‘Labyrinthus Continui’: Leibniz on substance, Activity and Matter,” edited by Roger Woolhouse. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Critical Assessments III (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), 289-320.
McMullin, Ernan. Newton on Matter and Activity. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.
Meli Bertoloni, Domenic. Equivalence and Priority. Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Nita, Adria. “Leibniz and prime matter”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 53, no. 3 (2015): 435-460.
Ockham, Guillelmus. Opera philosophica et theologica VI, edited by Stephanus Brown. New York: The Franciscan Institute, 1984.
Pasnau, Robert. Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Ruiz-Gómez, Leonardo. El concepto leibniziano de espacio. La polémica con Clarke y el newtonianismo. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2014.
Ruiz-Gómez, Leonardo. “Fuerza primitiva y fuerza derivativa en G.W. Leibniz: modificación y limitación”. Tópicos, 48 (2015): 141-168.
Scoto, Duns. Opera philosophica IV, edited by G. J. Etzkorn. New York: The Franciscan Institute, 1997.
Suarez, Franciscus. Disputationes metaphysicae, digitalized and edited by Salvador Castellote and Michael Renemann, 2016,
https://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Michael.Renemann/suarez/
Trésor de la langue Française informatisé, http://www.atilf.fr/tlfi, ATILF - CNRS & Université de Lorraine.