Noumenal Transfiguration of Vertices on the Rationalist Ontological Trihedron in Transcendental Dialectic (krv). Mapping between Categories and Universal Factoring Cones
Main Article Content
Abstract
Inquiry into the genesis and regulative vigor of νοούμεννον, an epistemic distortion of Plato's νοητόν, which assimilates the form and subsistent being of Thomism. The noumenon is postulated as the limit of gnoseological homomorphism by prosyllogistic ascent to the asymptotic unconditioned unity within the framework of a categorical theory. The conversio ad phantasma yields to the synthesis speciosa (Summa I, q. 84, a. 7: "The soul understands nothing without a phantasm") and the intelligible species becomes, as formalis ratio intelligendi, a pure conceptual form (analogy of proportion, solution of progress to subsistent being, is displaced by the schematic analogon). The essay also proposes an algebraic reading of the apparatus of functors on indexing cones in which the noumenon is established as a malicious vertex.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Publications Service of the University of Extremadura (the publishing house) retains the economic rights (copyright) of the works published in the Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho. Universidad de Extremadura.. The reuse of the content is allowed under a license:
CC BY
Recognition
This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak and build upon your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you are acknowledged as the author of the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. The maximum dissemination and use of the materials subject to the license are recommended.
For more information, see the following links:
References
Aristóteles, Metaphysica. Madrid: Gredos, 1970.
Christ, R. “The Inmortal”. En Bloom's Biocritiques: Jorge Luis Borges. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1986.
Fabro, C. “La problematica dello esse tomistico”. Aquinas 2 (1959): 194-225
Kant, I. Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 1920.
Kant, I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. En Kant's gesammelte Schriften I/4. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1968.
Llamas, V. “La diáspora metafísica. Epígonos del nooúmenon y fisionomía del Terror”. Carthaginensia 39, no. 76 (2023): 557-593.
Llamas, V. “Was ist Aufklärung? Génesis del canon burgués de universalidad ante rem”. Cauriensia 18 (2023): 191-234.
Longuenesse, B. Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l´Anatytique transcendantale de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993.
Millán-Puelles, A. “Ser ideal y ente de razón”. En La claridad en filosofía y otros estudios. Madrid: Rialp, 1958.
Nicolaci, G. “Cómo la libertad entra en la filosofía”. Anuario Filosófico 43 (2020): 99-119.
Paton, H. J. Kant´s Metaphysic of Experience, vol. II. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1970.
Philonenko, A. “Lectura del esquematismo trascendental”. Ágora 7 (1988): 9-25.
Rojas, G. Metamorfosis de lo mismo. Poesía completa. Madrid: Visor, 2003.
Schopenhauer, A. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. En Sämtliche Werke. Mannheim: F. A. Brockhaus, 1988.
Tomás de Aquino, Opera omnia, iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Romae: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1884.